#FCBarcelona #Sport #News
The Provincial Court of Barcelona has filed the complaint filed by the Mediapro group against the former president of FC BarcelonaSandro Rosell for alleged corporate espionage understanding that the evidence obtained they have no “sufficient foundation” to prove the commission of the crime.
In the car, the seventh section of the Audiencia de Barcelona dismisses the appeal filed by the president of Mediapro, Jaume Roures, and upholds the request of Rosell’s defense that the provisional dismissal of the proceedings in the case be agreed.
Mediapro denounced Rosell in 2016 for some events that occurred between 2009 and 2011, having had access to email of Jaume Roures, president of the aforementioned communication group.
The complaint was extended to the former head of the Mediapro IT department, Robert Cama; to the then general director of sections of FC Barcelona, Joan Carles Raventós, and FC Barcelona and companies Sport Marketing Bonus, owned by Rosell, and Socktel Computer Services.
At that time, Roures pointed out that tests provided by Mediapro demonstrated how Cama was deliberately and systematically accessing the emails that Jaume Roures received and sent, and sent almost all of them to Sandro Rosell and Joan Carles Raventós, who worked with him before joining the club.
Now, the Provincial Court has decided file the complaint against Rosell and also against FC Barcelona since he considers that the probative material is “weak” and lacks “all aptitude to generate certainty in the oral trial” because it is not proven that neither Rosell nor FC Barcelona instigated said espionage or obtained any benefit from it.
Rosell’s lawyer, Pau Molins, has stated in a statement that this resolution has prevented “Sandro Rosell from being once again subjected to a criminal trial for unsubstantiated accusations, after having suffered one of the most shameful ‘bench penalties’ in the history of the Spanish Justice, after having passed two years of his life in provisional prison for an alleged crime that never really took place. “
It also expects “a immediate rectification “by Roures, whom he has accused of “spread for years their unfounded suspicions against Rosell, soundly amplified thanks to their constant appearances in the media. “